# `jwspecabund` — chemical abundances `jwspecabund` turns a `FitResult` (from `jwspecfit`) or an `MCMCResult` (from `jwspecmcmc`) into element abundances: 12 + log(O/H), log(N/O), log(C/O), log(S/O), log(Ne/O), log(Ar/O), with electron temperatures, densities, and dust attenuation. ## Basic usage ```python import jwspecabund abund = jwspecabund.compute_abundances(result, z=6.0) print(abund.summary()) ``` ## Pipeline `compute_abundances` runs five stages in order: ### 1 — Dust correction A_V is derived from the **multi-Balmer decrement**. By default the anchor is Hβ (using Hγ/Hβ, Hδ/Hβ, H9/Hβ, H10/Hβ), but you can anchor on Hα — useful at moderate redshift where Hα is the highest-SNR Balmer line: ```python abund = jwspecabund.compute_abundances( result, z=2.5, balmer_anchor="Ha", # or "HBETA" (default) dust_law="salim", # or "cardelli" ) ``` A per-line A_V is computed against the anchor, then an inverse-variance weighted mean is returned. You can also supply `Av=` directly to skip the derivation entirely, or `dust_correct=False` to turn dust off. All line fluxes are then corrected at each line's own rest wavelength — the correction is fully wavelength-dependent. ```{note} **A_V is held constant across MCMC draws by default.** When the input is an `MCMCResult`, the single A_V derived above is applied once to every posterior draw (the Balmer-propagated A_V error is reported on the result but *not* marginalised into the abundance posteriors). To marginalise over A_V instead — each draw dust-corrected with its own A_V sample — opt in by passing `Av_err=` explicitly (and optionally `Av_prior="gaussian"` or `"uniform"`). ``` ### 2 — Electron density Three-zone density from whatever ratios are available: | Zone | Diagnostic | Fallback | | ----------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------ | | Low-ionisation | [S II] 6718/6732 | [O II] 3726/3729, else 300 cm⁻³ | | Mid-ionisation | C III] 1907/1909 | — | | High-ionisation | N IV] 1483/1486 | mid-zone, else low-zone | Each zone can be forced manually: ```python abund = jwspecabund.compute_abundances( result, z=6.0, ne_low_override=500.0, ne_mid_override=2.0e4, ne_high_override=1.0e5, ) ``` ### 3 — Method selection | Method | Triggered when | What it does | | --------------- | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `"direct"` | [O III] 4363 detected (SNR ≥ `snr_auroral`) | T_e from [O III] 4363 / (5007 + 4959); ionic abundances via PyNEB | | `"direct"` (UV) | 4363 absent, O III] 1666 detected | T_e from 1666 / (5007 + 4959); larger 7.5 eV gap → more sensitive | | `"strong_line"` | No auroral line available | Sanders+25 simultaneous polynomial across O3, O2, R23, O32 | | `"forward"` | Requested explicitly | Cullen+25 Bayesian forward model, sampling T_e, n_e, log U, ionic abundances | ### 4 — Ionic and total abundances For the direct method, PyNEB computes O⁺/H⁺, O²⁺/H⁺, N⁺/H⁺, C⁺/H⁺, C²⁺/H⁺, Ne²⁺/H⁺, S⁺/H⁺, S²⁺/H⁺, Ar²⁺/H⁺, Ar³⁺/H⁺. ICFs convert ionic to total: - **N/O** — Martinez+25 (multiple tiers auto-selected, override via `icf_tier=`) - **C/O** — Garnett+97 - **S/O, Ne/O, Ar/O** — Izotov+06 ### 5 — T_e-T_e relation When only the high-ionisation T_e is measured, the low-ionisation T_e comes from: - `"desi"` (default) — DESI DR2 calibration - `"classical"` — Garnett 1992 ## Result fields | Field | Description | | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | | `OH`, `OH_err` | 12 + log(O/H) and uncertainty | | `NO`, `CO`, `SO`, `NeO`, `ArO` (+`_err`) | Element ratios | | `Te_high`, `Te_low` (+`_err`) | Electron temperatures (K) | | `ne`, `ne_low`, `ne_mid`, `ne_high` | Electron densities (cm⁻³) | | `Av`, `Av_err` | Dust attenuation | | `logU`, `logU_err` | Ionisation parameter | | `ionic` | Dict of ionic abundance ratios | | `icf_method`, `NO_icf_name` | ICF scheme and tier used for N/O | | `OH_posterior`, `NO_posterior` | Full posterior arrays (MC / MCMC) | | `method` | `"direct"` / `"strong_line"` / `"forward"` | ## Lyα escape fraction When Lyα is present, the intrinsic flux is predicted from the dust-corrected Balmer lines via Case B, and the escape fraction `f_esc = F_obs(Lyα) / F_int(Lyα)` is returned with MC propagation of A_V uncertainty: ```python print(abund.lya_f_esc) # median print(abund.lya_f_esc_err) # (lo, hi) ``` See {doc}`../abundance_methodology` for the full derivation.